L’expression “may be covered by US Patent X” peut aider à éviter des problèmes de marquage de brevets aux États-Unis

C’est la décision dans PEQUIGNOT v. SOLO CUP

Voir le commentaire de Gray on Claims dont voici un extrait:

Regarding the use of “may be covered” language in marking, the Court stated that “it is highly questionable whether such a statement could be made ‘for the purpose of deceiving the public,’ when the public would not reasonably be deceived into believing the products were definitely covered by a patent.”

 

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: