Bon argument du Federal Circuit contre des interprétations larges d’un examinateur du USPTO

Voir l‘article de commentaire de Gray on Claims avec l’extrait suivant:

While noting that the PTO is required to give claims their “broadest reasonable construction”, the Court also pointed out that “claims should always be read in light of the specification and teachings of the underlying patent” and the broadest reasonable construction rule does not give the PTO “an unfettered license to intepret claims to embrace anything remotely related to the claimed invention.”

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: