Jurisprudence récente: prédiction valable et suffisance de description

Purdue Pharma v. Pharmascience Inc., 2009 FC 726 (CanLII) — 2009-07-16

Voir les points soulevés dans la décision:

[5]               I shall deal with the application as follows:

 

Paragraph(s)

Patents of Invention – A Few Basics 6 – 20
Oxycodone and Patent ‘738 21 – 34
Skilled Addressee 35
The Expert Witnesses 36 – 47
Analysis 48 – 63
Development of Patent ‘738 64 – 75
Grounds of Invalidity 76 – 116
            Anticipation 78 – 82
            Obviousness 83 – 100
            Sound Prediction of Usefulness 101 – 104
            Overbreadth and Lack of Disclosure 105 – 116
Conclusion

117 – 118

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: