«
»

Mémo aux examinateurs du USPTO suite à la décision KSR c. Teleflex

Des arguments pour répondre aux objections des examinateurs pour évidence:

[I]n formulating a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) based upon a combination of prior art elements, it remains necessary to identify the reason why a person of ordinary skill in the art would have combined the prior art elements in the manner claimed.

Voir le memo au complet

This entry was posted on May 9, 2007 at 2:52 AM and is filed under US-Brevets-Patents. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a comment