Jurisprudence récente: Une ordonnance Anton-Piller renversée par la Cour fédérale

Dans une affaire de contrefaçon de DVDs, l’ordonnance est tachée, selon le juge, de quelques défauts procéduraux:

[8]               The Defendant made two procedural objections:

1.                  there is no affidavit of the attending solicitor; and

2.                  counsel for the plaintiff is the same person who filed two of the six solicitors reports.

[9]               In my view, both of these objections are well founded.

Voir Ayngaran International Video & Audio Inc. v. Universal DVD Inc., 2006 FC 948, (August 2, 2006)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: